approach

data

sample

analysis

strength of evidence

chain of reasoning

cost of planning

cost of execution

cost of analysis

1

quasi-experimental, multi-institutional

quant & qual

8 institutions, 217 subjects

statistical & qualitative

medium

good presentation. Some flaws

high

high

high

2

experimental

numeric

72 males

statistical

low

weak

med-high

med

low

3

survey

scales (open questions)

??

compilation

LOW

---

low

low

low

4

psychometric experiment (2x2 mixed measures)

numeric (scales)

90

statistical (factor analysis)

patchy

patchy

high

medium

medium

5

quasi-experimental

pre- & post- test

numeric

?? 46-ish ??

basic stats

patchy/low

weak, gappy & thin

low

low

low

6

census (longitudinal)

numeric & qual

48 unis

85 courses

(% population?

departments?)

compilation

strong

few conclusions drawn

very low

(bugger all)

very high

(shitload}

low

7

on-line survey

qual & numeric & grades

40/200

“I put them into a spreadsheet”

(basic stats)

weak (But served its purpose)

average

low (3 afternoons)

very low

low

8

quasi-experimental

survey (validated instruments)

pre & post test

 

numeric

~270 (/400)

statistical

OK, but limited

(based on averages)

moderate conclusions

explicit

unexposed assumptions

good

high

(part of larger endeavour. This paper a hitchhiker)

moderate

med-low

 

 

  1. A multi-national, multi-institutional study of assessment of programming skills of first-year CS students Michael McCracken, Vicki Almstrum, Danny Diaz, Mark Guzdial, Dianne Hagan, Yifat Ben-David Kolikant, Cary Laxer, Lynda Thomas, Ian Utting, Tadeusz Wilusz
  2. Collaborative Group Interactions of Students from Two Ethnic Backgrounds S. Wright and D. Lander
  3. Soft or Hard Boiled: Relevance of Soft Skills for IS professionals Snell, S., Snell-Siddle C. and Whitehouse, D.
  4. Using online surveys to measure three key constructs of the quality of human-computer interaction in web sites: psychometric properties and implications Van Shaik, P. & J. Ling
  5. An innovative approach to teaching first year programming supported by learning style investigation Fowler, L., Campbell, V., McGill, D. and Roy, G,
  6. Introductory Programming:  What’s happening to day and will there be anyone to teach tomorrow? Michael De Raadt, Richard Watson and Mark Toleman
  7. Learning about software development – should programming always come first? Margaret Hamilton and Liz Haywood
  8. The influence of web-supported independent activities and small group work on students’ epistemological beliefs Denise Tolhurst